Talk:Nicotinic antagonist

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 98.204.241.151 in topic Buprorion

Do we need to mention varenicline here? JFW | T@lk 10:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'd support its inclusion. --Arcadian 19:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn't. Varenicline is a nicotinic partial agonist, not an antagonist. Thinking of buproprion? That should be here.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rocuronium edit

Should we include rocuronium? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.34.53 (talk) 03:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, yes, all of the "oniums" apply.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Succinylcholine edit

Why is this listed here? Isn't succinylcholine an nictonic agonist? A depolarizing agent can't be an antagonist; the depolarization happens as a result of the agonist binding.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Buprorion edit

We should include buproprion.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply