Talk:Next Great Baker season 3

Incorrect edits by 50.81.90.92

Earlier today I made some correcti0ons to the article, explaining the rationale for the changes in my edit summaries. These were almost completely reverted, re-introducing the errors previously removed. The errors corrected were as follows:

• In season 2 of the series we assigned the episode number "9A" to the "Finale Pre-Show" because it was not allocated an episode number in the source used for the episodes.[1] However, "New Year's Eve, Hoboken Style!" is listed as #305 at the source, so assigning it the episode number "4A" is incorrect, as the following episode, "Wedding Belles" is listed as episode 6, not 5. This means that the link changes in the contestant progress table were incorrect, so the original links were restored.
• Because episode 5 was a non-contest episode, I removed it from the contestant progress table, as it serves no purpose there.
• Upon reviewing episode 1, I found that it was quite categorically stated that the team of Ashley, Paul and Jessica won the cake challenge. It was then that Ashley was declared MVP; the two events were related but separate. Therefore, placing a blue box next to Paul and Jessica, indicating that they "had one of the best cakes for that challenge, but did not win". Both were winners of the challenge; they just weren't MVPs. Accordingly, I fixed that and added a note.
• Similarly, upon reviewing episode 4, I found that it was quite categorically stated that the team of Ashley, Chad, Gretel-Ann, Paul and Peter won the bakers challenge. Again, it was then that Ashley was declared MVP and again the two events were related but separate. Accordingly, I fixed that and added a note.

I intend citing these last two items useing {{Episode list}} and I'll do that shortly. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Despite requests to discuss these issues on the talk page,[2][3] the IP persists in refusing to discuss, something the IP has been warned about and blocked for in the past.[4] Instead, he has continued making contentious edits, and introducing origiginal research into the article.[5] --AussieLegend (✉) 15:53, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Incorrect edits by 67.186.116.240

67.186.116.240 seems to have taken over the "incorrect edits" mantle with the departure of 50.81.90.92. Typical changes are these. 67.186.116.240 does not leave edit summaries, despite requests on his/her talk page so the rationale for these edits is not known but, based on the latest bout of edits by this IP,[6] the following notes seem appropriate:

• We don't consider a member of a winning team to be only "HIGH" because one member of the team was declared to that team's MVP. The declaration of one contestant of a team as that team's MVP does not stop the rest of that contestant's team from winning the challenge; therefore all members of the winning team should be shown as a green "WIN" for the challenge. A cornflower blue "HIGH" is not appropriate as the key for that says "The baker(s) had one of the best cakes for that challenge, but did not win", and clearly, having been in the team that won, "HIGH" does not apply.
• In episode 9, Gretel-Ann was a member of a two-person team, the other being Chad, who was eliminated. Obviously she was last to move on, but she was not "singled out as one of the worst teammates" at all. This is one of the defining criteria for an orange "LOW", so an orange "LOW" does not apply. Instead, she is a pink "LOW". --AussieLegend (✉) 06:06, 12 February 2013 (UTC)