Talk:New York Giants (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jerzy in topic Soccer teams
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

(Madagascar) edit

I'd like to suggest removing the pop culture reference in Madagascar. That belongs in the Pop Culture section of one of the main articles or in the Madagascar article itself. It's certainly not what people are looking for when they search for the New York Giants and does not belong on this disambiguation page. Bigmantonyd (talk) 22:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Indeed. In fact, the lack of mention in the film's article, and apparent lack of any red lk reflecting that usage, make the entry contrary to MoSDab. Removing.
    --Jerzyt 03:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

MLB refs edit

The references to Major League Baseball do nothing to contribute to Dab'n of "New York Giants". In fact, it is used twice to describe teams that arose prior to the creation of the National Commission in 1903, which the holder of the trademark "Major League Baseball" apparently regards as the point when major league baseball went from being something without a clear definition to something with a single meaning and therefore even retrospectively describable with a capitalized title. (One of the two died before MLB claims to have been born!)
--Jerzyt 05:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Soccer teams edit

The sports team topics are now a ToC-entry section, but its subdivisions should not full-fledged sections. Instead, baseball (2 entries) and soccer (3) now have plain-text headings. "Soccer teams" also has an anchor, which is needed as a target for the Rdr that replaces the former multi-topic article New York Giants (soccer) -- which had all the faults of the deprecated multi-stub article scheme, plus covering two topics in sufficient bulk to deserve their own articles even if you like multi-stubs, and duplicating coverage of those two's existing articles.
--Jerzyt 07:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply