Talk:New Jersey Route 83/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by ComputerGuy890100 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

This article needs some work in order for me to consider this as a GA.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    The prose is very messy, for example: You use "meets" many times in the description, try "intersects"; "oute 83 was originally legislated as a part of Route 49 in 1927", what does legislated mean?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    My greatest concern is the prose, so I am putting the article on hold. ~~ ComputerGuy 22:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay, to pass it, get a map in SVG form. ~~ ComputerGuy 23:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have put in a request for a map at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests and I am still waiting. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

It has been almost 2 weeks, no map, failed. ~~ ComputerGuy 20:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article should not have been failed due to lack of a map. Articles are passed or failed according to the good article criteria, and in addition, there is nothing the nominator could have done to create a map. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay then, still on hold. ~~ ComputerGuy 20:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
The article has a map now Dough4872 (talk) 15:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article is now a GA. PASS ~~ ComputerGuy 00:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply