Talk:New Harbour, Newfoundland and Labrador

Untitled

nomination for deletion:I object to this deletion due to the following reasons:1,it is a geographical location,and geographical locations,as another wikipedian told me,have notability by default.2:I still,despite my number of contributions,am not fully familiar with wikipedia editing,and less so with creation and major expansion,of articles,expansion most of all.I understand from a message concerning this,that it was untidy,and information not listed properly and coherently.I am actually agreeing with this point,but I have learned from my mistake,and I would like to be allowed time to try to fix this,and rebuild my article.I will strive to,and I think I can and will succeed,rebuild it,this time coherently,and at least,rebuild so that others can help me with organize the information already inside it.In the message,I was told it was "unsalvagably" incoherent.based on my interpretation of its meaning,that it could not be organized so that it was more coherent,I can change this,but I may need help creating categories of information,or even paragraphs,but in rebuilding,I can make this help easier.conclusion:while both reasons give what I think is good objection,number one means that if only a small paragraph is present,it tells existance of a geographical location,and its location,which,in the proper circumstances,can prove valuable to a researcher,but,as in number 2,extra helps even better,but,as I now agree with,it must be coherent.this article means alot to me,and perhaps to some researcher.I ask that it please not be deleted.Keserman (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

referencing project,please read all!important!Keserman (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

PLEASE READ,AND READ ALL!Keserman (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

the article new harbour,newfoundland and labrador,main article to this talk page,has a fair but decreasing amount of unreferenced information.having atmitteed to this as the creator,i,as the creator,have started a process,to remove unreferenced information in the end,if unreferencable,reference existing information,and add only referenced information.this should be over by july 20,2010,my time zone,but probably around july 16-18,and during this time,i ask editors to not do major edits,this gives me information to sort.thank you for please cooperating to maximize the quality of my article.Keserman (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

the above mentioned project is over,page is open to grammar edits,needs CAPITALIZATION.Keserman (talk) 12:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

ghtftygf so it will let me save page,all info above Keserman (talk) 12:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

No, the page still needs references regarding the health issues due to PCBs. De728631 (talk) 13:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

titles of sections mistakes and such/thanks from Keserman (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

well now.thank you to anybody who is seeking to improve the article,especially those who are seeking to fix my mistakes,due to less editing.but i must address a concern:the section i have called stores again,was previously called stores/establishments,and was changed to economy by another,is not suitible for the title "economy",for the following reasons at least:the section is supposed to list and describe the retail establishments available to the general public.to buy merchandise,which needs expansion,which i will take care of.the economy,however is community money matters,work,and income,and spending of money.other buisnesses such as the fish plants,are an income for a large percentage of the population,but are not "stores" open as retail to the general local public.this economy includes the stores,but is certainly not limited to them.they are only a source of work and income for a small percentage of the community,and retailers for others to spend money on,not intended to be discussed in a general list and description of retail establishments available to the general local public.however,if someone wants to open a section,with economy,and can reference it,you are more than welcome.Keserman (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I have again changed the title of this section, moreover I think the whole section is totally unnecessary in encyclopedic terms. Individual local stores are not notable enough for inclusion. And please don't make comments in the article referring to the talk page, that is what the edit summary is meant for. De728631 (talk) 13:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

ownership.

to warn anybody,i don not own this page,nor anyone else,but i care a lot for it.i may check it for changes rather posessively,but i care for the quality of it and its information quite a bit.so i'd like to establish to people this,and that i may edit out what i think best,though i appreciate all editing ultimately.but please,i ask for the page,try to only add referenced material,do not try to edit it without cause.the creator,Keserman (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

thanks

Not using this page for a forum, but I do want to thank the users who have added information to this article. I DO NOT own this article but did create it and this is the place I am from, so I do care for it more than others, so seeing vandalism on it like I have before is upsetting, and not good for any article. I encourage others to add correct information to it as I hope to do. Please do not vandalize it, or any article for that matter. Thanks,Keserman (talk) 23:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Harbour, Newfoundland and Labrador. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100726060213/http://www.baccalieutourism.com/baccalieu/nhr.htm to http://www.baccalieutourism.com/baccalieu/nhr.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)