Talk:Neverland (miniseries)

Indians

The article says that the Indian tribe is Kaw. Source for that? They remind me more of the native peoples living along the Pacific northwest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.86.168 (talk) 17:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Mermaids

What about the mermaids? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.125.120.94 (talk) 15:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neverland (miniseries). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515094514/http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=12803 to http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=12803

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Anachronism requires explanation

I haven’t seen this production, but I can tell from the plot summary that it’s riddled with anachronisms inconsistent with James M. Barrie’s original (ex., Hook is presented as being from 1906, but in every production overseen by Barrie he’s dressed as an eighteenth century pirate). The statement that Fludd is an alchemist serving Elizabeth I looks like a mistake, not an anachronism. In 1906, Elizabeth had been dead three centuries, Victoria five years and Edward VII was on the throne. You cannot dump this statement into the article without explanation, and if none is forthcoming, it will be removed as a mistake. And, no, “he’s an alchemist” is not an explanation. “Alchemy” has meant a wide variety of things in different contexts, and it does not at all explain anything in this one. 2603:9001:4500:1C09:E1E6:3410:64AD:58D8 (talk) 13:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)