Reverted to version from December 2020

edit

... to get rid of what looks like several months' worth of promotional additions plus some weird possible copy/paste. I've also done some copyediting to try to cut the detail down. It does need more work though if anyone feels called to it. Tacyarg (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

RfC on improving this article about local public transport

edit

RfC on improving this article about local public transport. Article has been tagged for length and detail since 2018. It lacks reliable sources and has a lot of info which I think will degrade over time. What is the best way forward here? Should it be cut down to a minimum? (Added to RfC history / geography as the least worst fit.) Tacyarg (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why have you gone for RfC without exhausting the suggestions st WP:RFCBEFORE? All I can find is the two-sentence thread immediately above, which was posted less than three hours before you started the RfC. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Apologies, I have removed the RfC tag and will explore other paths. Tacyarg (talk) 07:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply