Talk:Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Error in the Background section? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the sentence starting, "According to 35 U.S.C. § 102b, a patent is valid if...", it seems to me that the word valid should instead read invalid. The Court's decision at the end of the paragraph is that the patent was invalid, which otherwise doesn't follow.

Anyone?

70.96.45.151 (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic