This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I don't know anything about the NSA, and I'm not American so I care less. But ... in Wikipedia terms, this is a terrible article. It consists of three sentences, one of which is an allegation by a pressure group and referenced to that pressure group. The article has NO reliable sources at all. I've added a WP:POV tag because the article feels as if it was written by someone who hated them and knew nothing but that one web page slanging them. Box2112 (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've revised the page, removed the allegations and unreliable sources and added whatever I could find. What is stunning, tho, is the lack of almost *anything* reliable online. The hate directed at the NSA is extraordinary, and almost all astroturf as far as I can see (and I detest smoking myself). Box2112 (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I restored some of the verbiage (with references) and added some additional text as well. In all, I added five additional references to more reliable sources -- journals, a book, and ABC News. Mojoworker (talk) 23:09, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply