This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This overlooks the existence of a Military Service Act of 1942, which provided for compulsory enlistment into the Home Guard where units of the latter were under strength. The link to the Act in the latter page connected it with the Act of 1939, this page. Also, the 1939 Act would not be allowing for women who had adopted children before a date in 1941!Cloptonson (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
It is very unlikely that 1939 legislation would refer to 1941. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.192.125 (talk) 16:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The lead section says "...enforced full conscription on all males between 18 and 41 who were residents in the UK...", but the Exemptions section specifies "Married women" and "Women who had one or more children 14 years old or younger living with them". Were women conscripted under this act? If so then it should say this in the lead. I think that the article is an amalgam of three acts: National Service (Armed Forces) Act 1939, the National Service Act 1941 and the National Service (No 2) Act 1941. The latter two acts demand new articles. The 1941 No 2 act extended conscription to women, and it is likely that the exceptions for some women are in this act. The archivist's notes on this page are a good source: "Records of the Military Recruitment Department, 1939-1960". The National Archives.. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
The source gives the impression that the second 1941 Act applied to women from 18 to 51. It seems to have applied to women from 20 to 30. As already noted, two new articles are needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.192.125 (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.svg)
