 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Why is it that the original cabecera of Ixtahuacán was "supposedly ruined" by Hurricane Mitch? The terrain in that entire region from Sololá to Xelajú is very rugged and clayey, prone to mudslides. I remember the mudslides as having been fairly extensive in the area, and there seem to have been further mudslides in the area since then.
Saying it was "supposedly ruined" creates a tone of doubt and suspicion that doesn't seem justified under the circumstances. --Compenguy (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)