Talk:Musicmagic

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Musicmagic/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements for

Start-Class criteria:
Y An infobox.
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album.
Y A track listing.
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name.
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year.

B-Class criteria:
Y All of Start class criteria.
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art.
N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section).
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs.
N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
N A casual reader should learn something about the album.

C-Class criteria:
N All of B-Class criteria.
N A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details.
N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians.
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.

Cdl obelix (talk) 22:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 22:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic