Talk:Muscari

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)


Muscari comosum is eaten often in Italy and it's good, not toxic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.43.197.119 (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

It does not make any sense to link back m comosum to the main article! Mgoodyear (talk) 01:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Split edit

Muscari, Leopoldia and Pseudomuscari are now treated as separate genera by recent reliable sources (e.g. Kew, APweb), whereas they were combined here. I've now changed the redirects for "Leopoldia" and "Pseudomuscari" into articles, and moved relevant material from here into those articles. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muscari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply