Talk:Multipartite entanglement

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 89.3.212.183

I am interested in this subject area but I found the article confusing because it uses too many technical terms that are not explained. I some cases it links to articles that do not exist and probably never will exist such as "separable and entangled states" in the first sentence. Such terms are closely tied to the subject matter of this article and need to be explained here. There are also links to words like concurrence but wikipedia only has an article about this as a legal term.

On the other hand it seems to miss some obvious links to related articles such as "Quantum entanglement" Weburbia (talk) 11:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

this article is obviously not in optimal shape right now. it looks like a cut and paste job. Mct mht (talk) 19:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
this article is total crap. Just from the first definition that is so wrong 89.3.212.183 (talk) 10:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I believe this article was copied from Quantiki.org. This is fine, as Quantiki is a wiki licensed under the GPL. However, the Quantiki article shouldn't be cited as it is merely a wiki itself. Either reputable published sources should be cited (textbooks or journal articles) or nothing should be cited at all. However, it good to note where the material originated from on this discussion page. Njerseyguy (talk) 19:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Geometric measure of entanglement into Multipartite entanglement

edit

Not enough content for this article to stand on its own, and feels like a topic that shouldn't have its own article. The proposed merge target is the only article linking to it. This merger was recommended at [[1]]. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 16:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Done Since nobody has commented in more than a week, I've gone ahead and implemented the merge. XOR'easter (talk) 21:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply