Talk:Multi-master replication

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Multi-master replication article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Sun Java One Directory Server

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Sun Java One Directory Server has has Multi Master Replication for a very long time... Webhat 20:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article is incomplete :( patrick Wed Jan 10 20:34:00 CET 2007

Postgre does not offer multimaster replication. This is provided by third party tools. Saying otherwise is akin to saying Ford "offers" many tires, including Toyo, Yokohama, and Michelin. 76.114.194.25 (talk) 16:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cloudant

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

I work for Cloudant, but made an edit noting that Cloudant's API provides the same kind of replication as CouchDB. This seems questionable given Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest, so could someone proof the change to double-check that it is faithful to Wikipedia's goals?

Garbados (talk) 18:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

mbdahQUfeowiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiugsywhskdyuyv8612v68cr3v7c98p3 p982 y398yr87t 98y r98287  hugfeu  ejieufy hu bhuf kdehf iu 98ud8  ur9ehf9w u2erh i2e ioeuoioqfoiuqa qo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:4408:14A4:CB00:106D:2D2F:2319:90FD (talk) 10:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic