Talk:Muhammad the World-Changer: An Intimate Portrait

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Muhammad the world changer.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

That is a fair-use image of the book's cover. It's OK if hosted on en.wikipedia but not on Commons.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 05:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

More reviews

• Religion News Service:
  • https://religionnews.com/2021/11/12/new-biography-offers-novel-approach-to-life-of-muhammad/
• Library Journal:
  • https://www.libraryjournal.com/review/muhammad-the-worldchanger-an-intimate-portrait-2125637

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 05:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Also The Booklist

• https://www.proquest.com/docview/2568762165/6331FDFF05B14055PQ

There's also an additional piece of coverage of the Portuguese edition of the book in Diário de Notícias.

• https://www.dn.pt/edicao-do-dia/18-jun-2022/maome-era-poderoso-na-sua-simplicidade-14948843.html

So those should be helpful. Silverseren^C 06:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Minor note: I believe the Library Journal and Booklist reviews are by the same reviewer (Hassanali), though the reviews themselves are different (I suppose he writes multiple reviews for different venues). The Religion News Service is also cited in the article. One thing the article doesn't do well is to also convey the criticisms of reviewers like Hassanali and Rosen, even though both are cited and the latter is quoted. R Prazeres (talk) 08:05, 20 May 2023 (UTC)