Talk:Mr. India (1987 film)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kailash29792 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • No issues with the non-free use rationale.
  • Is there no secondary source for the runtime?
This BBFC link will direct you to a 1988 film of the same name, but the cast is entirely different. So, it must be a different film. I use the version that was provided on YouTube, you can search it by yourself if you want to see it. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 02:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
The link --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "The film's principal photography, which was handled by Baba Azmi, was shot in" → "Principal photography, handled by Baba Azmi, took place in"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Plot and cast edit

  • Plot is under 700 words so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
  • Remove the comma after "ends meet".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a serial comma after "Seema, Calendar".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • No issues with #Cast.

Production edit

  • "consisting Salim Khan" → "consisting of Salim Khan"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "given with the role" → "given the role"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove the hyphen between "future-wife".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "choreographer and action director" → "choreographers and action directors"
I have added respectively. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "character become invisible" → "character invisible"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Recite sources at the end of each quote per WP:QUOTE.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Everything thing else appears to be properly sourced.

Soundtrack edit

  • "2.5 million cassettes sold according" → "2.5 million cassettes were sold, according"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a serial comma after "Aiyyaa (2012)"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Release edit

  • "released in Blu-ray" → "released on Blu-ray"
Removed --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove the comma after Pritish Nandy.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Legacy edit

  • Change uses of "..." to "[...]"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a comma after "Kapur said".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "As parts" → "As part"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sequel edit

  • "(who died in January 2005) before have affected the production" → "(who died in January 2005) affected the production"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

References edit

  • Archive all archivable sources.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Removed --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Drive by comments edit

Which source states that this film is based on The Invisible Man? I thought it is not an adaptation of the novel, except for featuring the protagonist having the powers of invisibility. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply