GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Artem.G (talk · contribs) 19:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I was thinking of reviewing this article, but instead I would just quick fail it.
The article has a lot of clean-up tags: [citation needed] x7 and [additional citation(s) needed], [dubious – discuss]. Some images are not very informative or just bad - File:Зеница_20191024_192120.jpg, File:Зеница_20190509_164252.jpg. Several sections are poorly cited: Ramadan, Charity, Frequency of attendance has a table with the data for 2009-2012 (it was 10 years ago, updated is needed), Architecture, Prayer hall, Makhphil, Mihrab, Minarets, Domes, Contemporary features, Rules and etiquette, Concentration. For the article of such importance all these points should be addressed before re-nomination.
I don't want to discourage you, and this article is really tough one, but I suggest you to go to WP:GOCE for copy-editing and, maybe, to Wikipedia:Peer review to get more specific comments. But right now it's a failed GAN 
. Artem.G (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)