Talk:Moses Malone/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 20:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Going to read through this article and will leave comments soon. MWright96 (talk) 20:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit

Early life

edit

Utah Stars

edit

Spirits of St. Louis

edit

Buffalo Braves

edit

Houston Rockets

edit

Philadelphia 76ers

edit

Washington Bullets

edit

Atlanta Hawks

edit

Milkawakee Suns

edit
  • "reportedly for a $1.6 million salary in the first season and a $2 million salary" - replaced the emboldened text to wage to avoid reptition

Player profile

edit

References

edit
  • References 1, 39, 81 needs the date it was published
  • Reference 34 is missing the author who wrote the article and its publication date
  • United Press International needs to be added in as the agency for Reference 47
  • References 15, 19, 20, 30, 46, 49, 87 & 89 are missing Associated Press as the agency of their respective works
  • Reference 76 needs archiving and the date it was published

The prose itself is overall good but some minor issues with it and the references will need addressing before it can have any chance of passing as a GA. MWright96 (talk) 18:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. I'll get on this in the next day or so. It's possible I may have time this afternoon but I'm not sure. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Since all of the queries above have been addressed, this article can now be promoted to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 07:14, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply