Talk:Monte do Gozo

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monte do Gozo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100326131743/http://www.cvacaciones-montedogozo.com/EN/resort.html to http://www.cvacaciones-montedogozo.com/EN/resort.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Up-to-date info

Having read beforehand that english version AND recently taken the Camino de Compostella, I have really no choice in earnest to qualify (=rewrite) some of the text written there, so far an idea it gives from actual current data! (the fact there is NO spanish version of the page should have warned me). Monte do Gozo is NOT a required "stop" on the path to Santiago, if it ever was; it is purely an option (although there is not even a "cumplimentario" Camino sign about it). I have nothing against historical musing, but when you've walked hundred of kms and are on the last stretch of that endeavour, it's pretty depressing to discover Wikipedia (in that precise instance) let you down almost totally. For the one hour I was on a bench in front of the "Monte do Gozo" commercial wooden sign (waiting for a non-existing bus), I saw not ONE pilgrim going through there, they ALL went straight ahead on the new path without even a hint of making a stop; they new better then I. They had wisely NOT read that page and proceeded with their business which is after all to get to the Santiago cathedral (or more precisely to the somewhat hard-to-find "Centro de acogida al peregrino") in one piece. Consistent with that idea, the church clerk did not do any remark as to a "missing" Monte do Gozo seal/stamp and gave me my Compostella without problem. AlainR345^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 20:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)