Remove this page. It is a duplicate for the correct classification of Rhaphidophora tetrasperma

edit

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhaphidophora_tetrasperma 213.237.90.179 (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

It is not. It is a real and approved species. It has nothing to do with Rhaphidophora Tetrasperma, although its common name is unfortunately the same.
[1]https://www.gbif.org/species/2868240
[2]https://wfoplantlist.org/plant-list/taxon/wfo-0000245786-2022-12?page=1
[3]https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:163942-2 Jvsiu (talk) 18:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I would propose revisions to both pages referencing cross-confusion and distinct features between each plant if Monstera minima is, in fact, a real and distinct plant from the false mini monstera. An image of a real Monstera minima would also be helpful in clearing confusion. 2607:FB91:EC8:8CA8:AC39:BD72:8425:CE62 (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply