Talk:Monofilament fishing line

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 91.10.35.85 in topic Picture

History Needed

edit

It would be nice to put up the history of Monofilament lines.

  • Who first made/discoverd it
  • When was it first made/discoverd (Done) Joel M.
  • Why was it made/discoverd

I am currently researching this on my spare time. Maybe someone can help? Joel M.

We are now working on softenning mono filament fishnet and creating new invention but still not succeeded if any one wants to help in this line please contact makhariadahod@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.155.182 (talk) 13:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

use as a garrotte

edit

I seem to remember reading that this makes an extremely effective garrotte, any truth to this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by UltraMagnus (talkcontribs) 11:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article is about fishing. You might find the articles you are looking for here. --Geronimo20 (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually, this article is about monofilament line, which can be used for any number of things (note its use in medicine and jewelry making, mentioned in the article). Perhaps it should be moved to Monofilament line (currently a redirect to this article) or some other, more generic title? /ninly (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Spoken Article Update

edit

This article was recorded in 2006-2-27, since then, a lot of changes has occurred. Someone want's rerecord the article? It's my voice currently on the spoken article. Since I have an accent, it might be better if someone with less accent makes the recording... --Joel M. (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Photograph of bird entangled in Monofilament fishing line

edit

(Disscution based on the edits made on 07:42, September 17, 2010 [1])

 
A Pelagic Cormorant entangled with a fishing line.

I agree the photograph of the bird raped in fishing line is inappropriate to represent the article (the first top image), but it was not in this case. The image was illustrating the the section (as of this writing the section does not have a header but will be added soon) related to Monofilament fishing lines and the environment. That said, the section speaks of animales being entangled in the line and the image depicted such situation. What do you think about adding the image back to the section and finding other images to show what Monofilament lines look like for the top of the article? -- Joel M.Chat ✐ 14:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Monofilament fishing line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Picture

edit

The picture's description says "A bird entangled in monofilament line." It is however pretty unclear from the picture whether or not the bird is actually entangled. It could be, but the way the fibres are shown, it could very well be able to simply fly away from it.

If this is the worst picture of the problem, the problem might not even exist. If the problem does exist, the picture is not representative. The picture should go, whether or not there is a replacement. Better no visual representation than a misleading one. 91.10.35.85 (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply