Talk:Molson Coors/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitled
Where is it incorporated? Is it an American or a Canadian company? Fawcett5 22:05, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
I believe it's incorporated in both Canada and the United States. The "headquarters are in both Denver and Montreal. SaxofoneDL 20:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
While on their Official SEC filings they list both a Montreal address (1555 Notre Dame Street East, Montréal, Québec, Canada) and a Denver address (1225 17th Street, Denver, Colorado), because of the nature of the merger (structured as a takeover by Adolph Coors Co of Molson Inc. See Part 1 Item 1 of their 2005 Annual Report (Page FIN_3)) the legal "Country of Domicile" of Molson Coors Brewing Company (MCBC) is the USA (Part 1 Item 1(d) Page FIN_12 of the 2005 Annual Report). Syrrys 18:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
It was not a takeover of Molson by Coors however...former Molson shareholders own 55% of the stock...and why does the Denver location have (HQ) listed beside it when Molson coors has not desingnated an overall HQ, just a Canadian and American one, not only is it overkill when it is the list of headquaters, but leads to the impression that this is another American company that took control of a Canadian one. Justinmcl 16:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
5th largest brewer?
Is Molson Coors really the 5th largest brewer in the world? According to their website the volume of beer amounts to 48,3M Hectolitres. As far as I know both Carlsberg and Scottish & Newcastle have larger volumes. [1] 195.215.5.124 10:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand your problem with this statement. What's wrong with their claim of 5th largest when you can only think of 2 that are larger --Mysterioususer 23:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Inbev, SabMiller, Anheuser-Busch and Heineken is the top 4 brewery groups in the world. 195.215.5.124 (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC) [citation needed]
Environmental Record
Let's all read this section again, including the source note, and then ask ourselves whether it's really a good idea to let any schmo who feels like it come in and "edit" an encyclopedia that way too many people use to *look stuff up*. Sure, I could edit it myself, but I already have a job, that pays me money, and now I have to go find what I was looking for via some responsible, reliable source. Enjoy playing encyclopedia, folks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.215.74 (talk) 22:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 05:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Is this a dual-listed company or a cross listed company?
Is it one stock trading in two countries or two seperate stock represeting shares of the same assets? see dual-listed company vs. Cross Listing. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 19:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Environmental record section
The environmental record section isn't very well written and needs a rewrite in my opinion. The citations seem weak as well. Biased view? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.67.63.14 (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Grolsch
Grolsch seems to be rather main SABMiller brand, doesn't it? Arvedui89 (talk) 13:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Molson Coors Brewing Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090309040432/http://molsoncoors.com/about-us/ownership-structure to http://www.molsoncoors.com/about-us/ownership-structure
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103124625/http://money.cnn.com/2007/10/09/news/companies/bc.apfn.molsoncoors.sabm.ap/index.htm?postversion=2007100910 to http://money.cnn.com/2007/10/09/news/companies/bc.apfn.molsoncoors.sabm.ap/index.htm?postversion=2007100910
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120826011111/http://invest-iq.net/2012/04/cvc-starbev-sale/ to http://invest-iq.net/2012/04/cvc-starbev-sale/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080521023544/http://www.reason.org/ps210.html to http://www.reason.org/ps210.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)