Talk:Mols Bjerge National Park

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)


North, East or South...?

edit

I can see that the placement of MBNPark in the Jutlandic geography has been a cause of confusion. I want to set things straight. All three thing is (to some degree) true! ...but the most precise would be northern Jutland. Why and how can all three suggestions be true?

Why northern Jutland? from old days and generally speaking Jutland is on the gross scale divided into a northern part and a southern part, divided by the stream of Kongeåen. Look it up on wikipedia to read the details. In modern times several subdivisions has been introduced. for example northern Jutland is viewed as being divided into a northern Jutland and Middle Jutland (and one could throw in Himmerland between the two also) for political reasons, and according to this division MBNPark is in Middle Jutland (a fourth possibility!). Middle Jutland has previously been divided into an eastern and a western part and according to this somewhat outdated division, MBNPark is located in eastern Jutland. This subdivision has officially been abandoned as of 2007 on several levels. Last, the former region of Eastern Jutland were comprised by several subregions and the peninsula of Djursland was one of them. Djursland still exist as a political region though and is further subdivided into Northern Djursland and Southern Djursland. MBNPark is primarily located in Southern Djursland. So this explains why all three answers (to some degree) is true.

I hope this excursion cleared things up and explained why MBNPark is best described as being located in Northern Jutland? :-) (get a map and avoid a headache...)

RhinoMind (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mols Bjerge National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply