Drive by tagging taken to a new level

edit

Well, well, well. The article notes that the book was panned for having a Mary Sue main character and wooden supporting characters, yet tagger believes this reads like advertising.

Don't give up on your job yet.

And that by a user Eagle101 no less. (Well, I coudn't resist...) But that edit was AWB assisted, so it could have been a mishap. I'm removing the tag anyway. GregorB 18:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:MolonLabe!.jpg

edit
 

Image:MolonLabe!.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

2010

edit

This looks like a blurb to me too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.216.178 (talk) 15:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

edit

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply