Talk:Mohabbatein/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Nicholas Michael Halim in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox, Lead edit

  • The reference for the budget (infobox) has the wrong title.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • This says the budget was ₹190 million, so recite it and change the budget everywhere to ₹120–190 million
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "second-highest grossing" → "second-highest-grossing"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add commas after Shah Rukh Khan, Jimmy Shergill, and "Academy Awards".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Plot, Cast edit

  • In the last paragraph, add commas after "Sameer, Vicky" and "Sanjana, Ishika".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Other than that, the plot passes WP:FILMPLOT and the cast looks good.

Production edit

  • "highest grossing" → "highest-grossing"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "change his mind" → "changed his mind"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "made another" → "make another"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "a honest" → "an honest"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "role as Megha" → "role of Megha"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "tree male" → "three male"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "specially" → "specifically"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Recite references at the end of each quote.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Change uses of "..." (here and in other sections) to "[...]"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Music edit

  • Add a comma after Shah Rukh Khan.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Other than that, this section looks good.

Release, Critical reception edit

  • No issues here.  

Accolades edit

  • Table looks good.

References, External links edit

  • Mark references from The Hindu with "|url-access=subcription".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·