Talk:Model for assessment of telemedicine
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Model for assessment of telemedicine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 July 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Note edit
This article is an incoherent bunch of badly sourced jargon. I asked its creator to move it to draft space, but they were not responsive. So I am nominating it for deletion. Based on the username, the creator is from the organization that produced this assessment system, so we have some undisclosed COI here but that is a separate issue. Jytdog (talk) 23:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
New content edit
KK-CIMT added the following content to the article, instead of suggesting it here, which they should have done per the COI guideline. I removed it and am posting it here for others to comment on and use or not as they see fit:
A study of the use and perception of MAST twenty-one studies of telemedicine in the EU project Renewing Health has been made by Ekeland and Grøtland (2016). The questionnaire study shows that MAST was used and considered useful in the projects. A number of improvements were suggested including the use of process studies and additional information on technological usability, behavior change, caregiver perspectives and motivational issues of professionals.[1]
In a letter to the editor Kidholm, Jensen and Kotzeva (2016) has replyed and identified a number of misunderstanding in the questionnaire study. Firstly, the article describes how the existing seven MAST domains includes most of the outcomes called for. Secondly, the article stresses that assessment of telemedicine by use of MAST will include description of the technical, organizational and economic context in which telemedicine is used. [2]
References
- ^ Ekeland AG, Grøtland A. ASSESSMENT OF MAST IN EUROPEAN PATIENT-CENTERED TELEMEDICINE PILOTS. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 31:5 (2015), 304–311.
- ^ Kidholm K, Jensen LK, Kotzeva A. ON THE USE OF THE MAST MODEL IN ASSESSMENT OF TELEMEDICINE: A COMMENT ON EKELAND AND GRØTTLAND. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care / Volume 31 / Issue 05 / January 2015, pp 312-313.