Talk:Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

A fact from Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that, in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered a car dealer in Puerto Rico to arbitrate its Sherman Act case in Tokyo per a contract under Swiss law?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc..

Wikipedia

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Discretion#Abuse of discretion|abuse its discretion]] The anchor (#Abuse of discretion) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

is this syntactically correct ? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"requiring that the dealer arbitrate its claim before a panel in Tokyo"

The panel arbitrates the claim. Not the plaintiff.

In the legal sense, "arbitrate" is used in the same sense as "litigate", i.e. to mean doing it as a party, as well as in the more common sense of making the decision. As we define it in Wiktionary:

1. To make a judgment (on a dispute) as an arbitrator or arbiter

2. To submit (a dispute) to such judgment

(emphasis mine). Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic