Talk:Mississippi Highway 607/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Nova Chrysalia in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 22:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

  • Lede is a little short - could we bulk it up a little? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Because it's the main piece of info as to what the article is - can we link highway in the lede? In the UK for example, this has a different meaning (we'd say dual carriageway or motorway). Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • U.S. Route 90 (US 90) - we then shorten similar roads, without having defined them, like US 11. Is there a better way to do this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Maintained by MDOT in infobox isn't strictly cited in body. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • I actually think this bit is good info for the lede. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

General edit

  • The History section could probably be written a bit less frantically, and explain a bit more that the road is the remnants of US 90. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The History doesn't seem extremely clear when the road became the 607 - 1967? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • External links doesn't have any links, just a portal, can probably cull. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Review meta comments edit