Talk:Mind's Eye (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 03:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Might be worth sticking the "if the gloves don't fit" line into context with the OJ Simpson trial.
   

I also generally tend to stick in a little information about who nominees lose their award to, it'd be especially useful for Taylor as that's a prominent enough award to pique curiosity, plus she was up against Veronica Cartwright, also for The X-Files(Cloris Leachman won that one).
"leading a strength, an anger, and a redeeming humour to a blind woman" -> should be "lending", but I don't have the book to hand right now to check whether the mistake is theirs or a typo here.

1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Good. Wouldn't mind seeing this used to back up the Emmy nominations, though, as it's good to stick an official award source in as well as the third-party stuff.

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Seems good to me. Wondering if there's anything on the DVDs to add to this, I'll dig my season 5 out in the morning to check.

3. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Looks good.

4. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Grand.

5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   I fiddled with the Hepburn image a little to resize it but it's free and used well.

6. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Very little needing done here, just going to stick it on hold for the time being. Ping me again tomorrow if you need me to check the DVD extras, can't seem to find where I've left the box right now. GRAPPLE X 05:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Those Emmy cites make it look a lot better. I believe I've addressed everything. Thanks for the review.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Couldn't find anything on the special features to add; though I didn't watch the half-hour full season featurette. Ready to pass; well done! GRAPPLE X 11:29, 10 August 2012 (UTC)