Talk:Migration Letters
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | An email has been received at VRTS concerning some or all of the text on this page, and can be read by users with a VRTS account.
However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for the text. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published. For an update on the issue, please contact the user who added this template to the page, someone else with a VRTS account, or the VRT noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT volunteer, the text will be deleted. |
Reversions edit
To the anonymous IP reverting my edits to this page: Please read the link on how to write a good journal article in the banner just above, it will explain why I removed, for instance, the editorial board listing. See also WP:NOTADIRECTORY. Also, I corrected several errors in the journal infobox (have a look, instead of just reversing). The edits that I made are not vandalism, but your reversions are. Please stop or provide justifications for your edits just as I did in my edit summaries and now also here. --Crusio (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed edit
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.migrationinstitute.fi/cn_uutiset/news_e.php?subaction=showfull&id=1235398306&archive=&start_from=&ucat=1&. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MLauba (talk) 11:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Recent edits, categories, etc edit
Hi, some of the categories that you added do not even exist and are redlinked, I'll remove them again. The journal does not really seem to be an economics journal, even though it may sometimes touch upon such subjects, which I why I removed the category "economics journals". As for the "open access" category, I tried to access an article and was asked to pay a fee, so clearly it is not an open access journal, although some articles apparently are published OA. I'll remove that category, too, and will mark "hybrid" in the infobox. The (hidden) remark placed in the text was not meant to be nasty, I apologize if it was perceived that way. I just intended to say that without any explanation, how is the reader to know who these people are and why they should be mentioned here. If they had WP articles, one could simply create a wikilink, but as there are none, there should be something here enlightening the reader. As an aside, I should note that you have a clear COI and should do your best to edit this article as neutrally as possible. --Crusio (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Migration Letters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071111171323/http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&issn=17418984&genre=journal to http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=journal&issn=17418984
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131009082825/http://metapress.com/content/g838708m9804/ to http://www.metapress.com/content/g838708m9804/
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130128152758/http://www.metapress.com/content/g071q64713j54122/ to http://www.metapress.com/content/g071q64713j54122/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)