Talk:Melbourne Model

Opinion in Introduction section

The following is an entirely unsupported assertion:

Most of the criticism is focussed on the loss of jobs (and the consequent negative impact on staff:student ratios) rather than the curriculum itself.

No evidence is advanced that "Most of the criticism" was about job losses rather than "the curriculum itself". That is purely an OPINION. Please add "needs citation" or change! 115.64.132.182 (talk) 05:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Melbourne Curriculum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080729225956/http://www.nteu.org.au/news/2007/2007/16462 to http://www.nteu.org.au/news/2007/2007/16462
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720031812/http://www.vcasu.org.au/2007/04/19/andrea-hull-addresses-students-regarding-the-melbourne-model/ to http://www.vcasu.org.au/2007/04/19/andrea-hull-addresses-students-regarding-the-melbourne-model/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720025839/http://www.vcasu.org.au/2008/06/12/express-yourself-but-steer-clear-of-politics/ to http://www.vcasu.org.au/2008/06/12/express-yourself-but-steer-clear-of-politics/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 19 August 2017

Melbourne Curriculum → Melbourne Model – The article was originally created at this title, indeed, most of the mentions within the article itself are to the "Melbourne Model". The user who moved, Unicomms-wiki, made several such "official" edits and has since been blocked for a username which appears to represent the university. Per WP:COMMONNAME this page should be back where it began. Most of the citations in this article use Melbourne Model as their term. Recent coverage here and here calls it the "Melbourne Model", and the mover's argument about "official terminology" seems defunct anyway as the university's website calls it the Melbourne Model too. Triptothecottage (talk) 10:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Agree, COI editor was involved here so I have moved the page back. Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melbourne Model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720033033/http://www.vcasu.org.au/2008/04/29/vice-chancellor-lies-about-introduction-of-melbourne-model-at-vca/ to http://www.vcasu.org.au/2008/04/29/vice-chancellor-lies-about-introduction-of-melbourne-model-at-vca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)