Talk:Meet the Eels: Essential Eels, Vol. 1 (1996–2006)

Caps

Please stop See, for instance, Meet The Beatles. "The" is capitalized as a part of the proper name. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

The difference is that the band in your example is called "The Beatles", while the band in question is simply called Eels. Thus, "The Beatles" should generally be capitalized in titles referring to the band, while "the Eels" should not. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 01:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Names Sometimes - for example, this album - the band is billed as "The Eels." When they are, that is a part of their name. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Meet the Eels: Essential Eels, Vol. 1 (1996–2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228063054/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/47928-meet-the-eels-essential-eels-vol-i-useless-trinkets-b-sides-soundtracks-rarities-and-unreleased to http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/47928-meet-the-eels-essential-eels-vol-i-useless-trinkets-b-sides-soundtracks-rarities-and-unreleased
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070916090951/http://www.eelstheband.com/main.asp to http://eelstheband.com/main.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested edit

I am under a WP:0RR and have requested another editor revert himself, but he has refused. Per MOS:VAR, MOS:RETAIN, and WP:ALBUMSTYLE, this article should have its previous track listing style restored. Please edit this article to undo the addition of {{track listing}}. See this thread. @Fischbol: who introduced this issue and refused to address it and furthermore claims that I need to get consensus for the article to be the way it was for almost 20 years instead of him needing consensus to change it (See MOS:VAR: "When either of two styles is acceptable it is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change.", WP:BRD, etc.). @Cowboygilbert: who was willing to make similar edits on a previous request. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

@Koavf, I can try to make reason with the editors in both requests but no guarantees on it because WP:IAR. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 22:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

To be clear, the quotation above is directly from ArbCom. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Ah, okay. I am not very familiar with this MOS guideline unlike I am with CITEVAR. I'll try my best. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 22:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 22:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)