Talk:Marvel's Most Wanted/GA1
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Argento Surfer in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Argento Surfer (talk · contribs) 14:19, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Premise
- Not every reader will know what SHIELD is. I think a short descriptor, such as "..no help from S.H.I.E.L.D., the spy agency that previously employed them, they form..." in needed.
- Added. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Not every reader will know what SHIELD is. I think a short descriptor, such as "..no help from S.H.I.E.L.D., the spy agency that previously employed them, they form..." in needed.
- Cast and characters
- Who are being quoted in this section? The character descriptions should be attributed or paraphrased.
- Quotes attributed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- "Palicki knew of the character due to her status as the Avenger Mockingbird in the comics" This isn't very clear. Was Palicki a comic reader? Is it trying to say that Palicki was aware of the character prior to taking on the role?
- Clarified. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Who are being quoted in this section? The character descriptions should be attributed or paraphrased.
- Production
- "Bell compared Most Wanted to the Buffy the Vampire Slayer spin-off Angel, and said that series would be more intimate than Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." Suggest revising to "...Angel, saying the series would be...'
- Changed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- "Bell compared Most Wanted to the Buffy the Vampire Slayer spin-off Angel, and said that series would be more intimate than Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." Suggest revising to "...Angel, saying the series would be...'
- No pick-up and future
- no concern
- Lead
- no concern
- Premise
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- no concern
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- no concern
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- no concern
- C. It contains no original research:
- no concern
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- In Premise, "they form an uneasy alliance with rogue adventurer Dominic Fortune" is taken verbatim from source #4, which isn't cited in that section. This should be reworded or properly attributed. Earwig's other high ranked results are from extended quotes.
- What you quoted is a reword of the information from source #1, which stated: "Bobbi and Hunter form an uneasy alliance with Dominic Fortune, a rogue adventurer with a wealth of resources and even more adversaries...". Do you still wish source #4 be added, given this? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- How would you feel about "enter into an uneasy partnership"? Argento Surfer (talk) 17:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Fine with me. I've changed it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- How would you feel about "enter into an uneasy partnership"? Argento Surfer (talk) 17:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- What you quoted is a reword of the information from source #1, which stated: "Bobbi and Hunter form an uneasy alliance with Dominic Fortune, a rogue adventurer with a wealth of resources and even more adversaries...". Do you still wish source #4 be added, given this? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- In Premise, "they form an uneasy alliance with rogue adventurer Dominic Fortune" is taken verbatim from source #4, which isn't cited in that section. This should be reworded or properly attributed. Earwig's other high ranked results are from extended quotes.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- no concern
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- no concern
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- no concern
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- no concern
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- no concern
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass pending minor notes made above. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Argento Surfer: Thanks for reviewing. I've responded to your minor notes above. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- All concerns have been addressed. Nice work. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Argento Surfer: Thanks for reviewing. I've responded to your minor notes above. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Pass pending minor notes made above. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
