Talk:Marcus Lollius (father of Lollia Paulina)

(Redirected from Talk:Marcus Lollius (son of consul))
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Llywrch in topic Duplicate article?

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marcus Lollius (suffect consul). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate article? edit

The article states that this M. Lollius was "Lollius served as a consul perhaps as a suffect consul in 13" -- only no Lollius was consul that year. Further, all the consuls are known from Republican times to AD 20, or to AD 38 with uncertainty which of two men held the fasces in specific years. Looking at some of the sources, I find they reference the earlier M. Lollius, consul in 21 BC, not one who lived a generation later. I suspect this duplication is an unintentional product of haste &/or sloppiness.

I haven't finished investigating this matter, but I thought I should leave this warning for readers until I can complete my review. -- llywrch (talk) 23:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply