Talk:Manually coded English

Add topic
Active discussions
WikiProject Linguistics / Applied Linguistics  (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
 
WikiProject Deaf (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

UntitledEdit

I originally created this article for Wikipedia, but I decided to also use it in my Everything2 node on the same subject. Please note that "Cues" is intentionally capitalized. -Etoile 18:16, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

To Etoile and NTennis: Excellent work on this article. It really clears up a lot things for me. Ray Foster 17:59, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

MergeEdit

I think Sign Supported English should be merged into this file as it is covered under the title of this article --NeilEvans 21:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Agree. It's been suggested at the Sign Supported English with no objection, so please feel free to merge. ntennis 01:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

This section is generally inaccurate because SSE in the UK is: 1. Not offered as a self standing service by interpreters. There is no qualification in the UK which registers an interpreter to work between English and SSE. It is an adaptation, depending on the needs of the client. 2. SSE actually varies from person to person. SSE has a place on a 'diglossic continuum' between English and BSL and may move anywhere between SEE and Pidgin BSL.

recently added sentence National Signed English is a unique communication system that uses a combination of B.S.L., S.S.E. and N.S.E. It creates perfect syntax, present and past tenses and allows the user to communicate in word perfect English.

this entry seems a bit "promotional" - NSE is a new system launched this year by a small UK institution tied to a book launch at the same time as this entry was added to Wikipedia. A press release from the publishers carries links to this recent Wikipedia article (created for the release??) words like "unique" and "perfect syntax" read like a press release or promotional literature and shouldn't really be in wikipedia The attempted promotion of this system by the institution that created it (OCSL)among children has caused controversy in the Deaf community and not been welcomed by Sign Language professionals.

I am ammending the entry to be a bit less promotional but stil try to retain an unbiased place in this debate. Topmark 13:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

SSE Interpreting added word "limited" to "Interpreting services are available in the UK for SSE." to reflect real situation on the ground Topmark 12:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Pidgin Sign English -> Contact signEdit

Since the prevailing term for this form of sign has justifiably shifted, as was already described in the article --

PSE is increasingly referred to as 'Contact Sign', because it doesn't display the features linguists expect of a pidgin.

-- I have changed the name of the section to Contact sign, while keeping the old name in the form of a span id to support links that may exist from wiki or external pages: Manually Coded English#Pidgin_Sign_English_.28PSE.29.2C_or_.27Contact_Sign.27. --Thnidu (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Makaton and total communication - SE settings/language difficulties and baby signingEdit

I think we should include a section - or start an over-arching 'parent' article - and in general be carefully differentiating MCE and Makaton which uses BSL alongside English speech - at various levels of vocabulary - so that it nearly is a synthesised pidgin and to also again outline the relationship and comparison to various baby-signing approaches; I think it's sensible if not vital in this article. Makaton started with use with the deaf who were also learning disabled but has been useful for non-hearing-related language difficulties and is increasingly well known and frequently used alongside other sign-systems within special education. Baby sign as a kind of hot-housing and relationship boon for infants with no identified additional needs or slight delays or behaviour difficulties have also gained popularity. These are the reference points that general UK readers start with. That is significant. For instance 'cutting corners' and pidgins references in the article sound at once quaint and recognisable -- this topic-area need clarification which this article so far does not provide. I suggest it is particularly significant in relation to special schools where children with additional need who may or may not have hearing impairment use and are taught with a variety of communication strategies according to individual needs. Signing is well beyond use by the only the deaf community and their close supporters and allies now and it needs to be handled carefully with great precision. I think perhaps when outline of the world of sign languages and the situation with signing and special education are tackled it's also worth noting a link to the wider set of 'total communication strategies' . No expert here - a parent of a child with SEN and I also had grown up with disability awareness and with watching see-hear and Asian eye because of good heart and isolation and OCD about wanting to be well-versed and 'see' and 'listen' to everybody properly! Perhaps gestures - and any formalised sets - used in noisy workplaces are also worth looking for and including in the general sweep of reference points for general readership too. Kathybramley (talk) 10:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Manually coded English. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)