Talk:Manichaean Painting of the Buddha Jesus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Religion: Interfaith Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bias/specificity edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article seems largely a summary of one of the sources, namely Zsuzsanna Gulácsi, “A Manichaean Portrait of the Buddha Jesus: Identifying a Twelfth-Thirteenth-century Chinese Painting from the Collection of Seiun-ji Zen Temple.” Artibus Asiae 69/1 (2009): 91-145.

While this is not necessarily a bad thing, it does assume Zsuzsanna Gulácsi's assessment is incontroversible. But has the consensus been such that this painting is so certainly Manichaean that it deserves the page title to be thus adjectified? I address real academics.

Could this article be named "Seiunji Temple Painting of Buddha Jesus" or "Painting of crucifer Buddha" to avoid the weight of "Manichaean" before the article argues for it???

Alphonsoore (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic