Talk:Manchester, Michigan

Nick Davis Inclusion

I don't really see the need for having him on the page. It's really not all that notable in the grand scheme of things, however we shouldn't be adding editorials about it on the main page, we should just remove it. Thoughts? LilDice 15:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree, but to make it perfectly clear this is a user driven forum, your edits are no more significant than anyone else's. Therefore, do not edit others entries.

You're right, everyone's edits are equal, therefore it's perfectly acceptable for me to edit your edits and vice-versa, that's what makes wikipedia work. Take a look at the WP:POV guidelines, your edit violated this policy, we need to be neutral. Also sign your edits on the talk page like this ~~~~. LilDice 16:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I live in Manchester — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.219.217.66 (talk) 19:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manchester, Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to https://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)