Talk:Managed Extensibility Framework

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 188.4.89.163 in topic MEFContrib link broken

Text copyright edit

The two sections appear to be a copied from the documentation on CodePlex [1]. It's unclear the licencing of this is, it might be MS-PL or it might be the general licence for documentation on the site, but neither seem compatiable with CC-BY-SA for Wikipedia. Rich257 (talk) 13:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is this article written from a neutral viewpoint? edit

All factual claims are unsupported by a lack of citations. Moreover, the article consistently puts MEF in a positive light. (Btw, I'm a huge fan of MEF. But Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a marketing platform.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nacarlson (talkcontribs) 14:54, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

MEFContrib link broken edit

fix your links — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.4.89.163 (talk) 23:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply