Wikipedia:WikiProject .NET

WikiProject NET logo.svg

Some Wikipedians have formed a project to better organize information in articles related to Microsoft's .NET Framework. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians. If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there.

For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices.

ParticipantsEdit

Similar WikiProjectsEdit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games.

Related WikiProjectsEdit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Programming languages.

Related WikiportalsEdit

Related CollaborationsEdit

Wikipedia:Computer and video games improvement drive exists and may serve as an example to follow in order to create a computing "collaboration of the week".


Related groups of WikipediansEdit

Hierarchy definitionEdit

No classification of this project has been defined.

GoalsEdit

The main goal is that Wikipedia on .NET would be the reference of all issues related to .NET technology.

TasksEdit

Complete all categorization and stub tags as well as {attention} tags or {cleanup} tags into articles before taking care of the content.
  1. Categorize all the remaining articles related to .NET. We will revise this task before the end of September 2005. (In progress)
  2. Make sure there are no duplicate categorization in a single article. Category:.NET programming languages is child of Category:.NET Framework. (In progress)
  3. Tag {stubs} on short articles.
  4. Check for any articles that need {attention} tags or {cleanup}.
reinvent the structure of articles and discuss them on the project talk page.
Start the hard work; concentrate on content.

Adopt an articleEdit

Similar to the Collaboration of the week, but on a smaller scale, you might want to "adopt" an article. This would involve doing the research, writing, and picture-taking (if possible) for either a non-existent article or a stub. Of course, everyone else can still edit an adopted article, and you can work on other things too, but the idea is to find a focus for a while, to try and build up the number of quality articles the Project has produced.


Other subpagesEdit

TemplatesEdit

InfoboxesEdit

Stub templatesEdit

Talk page templatesEdit

WikiProject Microsoft / .NET (Rated Project-class)
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
  Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
This page is supported by WikiProject .NET.

Other templatesEdit

Add templates here if you see suitable.

CategoriesEdit

AssessmentEdit

==Lists==

Wikipedia articles on .NETEdit

New Wikipedia articles related to .NETEdit

Please feel free to list your new .NET-related articles here (newer articles at the top, please). Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them should be suggested for the Did you know? box on the Main Wikipedia page. DYK has a 72 hr. time limit from the creation of the article.

Did you know?Edit

Article improvement driveEdit

Collaboration of the weekEdit

Peer reviewEdit

Featured articlesEdit

Featured article candidatesEdit

Featured picturesEdit

Featured picture candidatesEdit

Featured listsEdit

Featured list candidatesEdit

Article alertsEdit

No Article alerts at this time.

RequestsEdit

Please Cleanup and remove biased information in this article: Comparison of C sharp to vb dot net

I have used both these languages extensively since .NET emerged and I don't really find too much to complain of in the linked article. In fact, I think it's a pretty good comparison, better than I see most places on the web. The one thing I would add would be a discussion of the Windows Designer added to C#, which makes it competitive with VB for rapid development. I might also add a mention of the fact that VB has nearly twice as many keywords as C#, which probably says something about the two languages but I'm not sure what--that VB takes longer to learn all of it? That it provides some extra help for some things? Anyway, would you mind clarifying why you consider the article biased? Or has it been cleaned up already?

Harborsparrow 00:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

ResourcesEdit

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/ --Kmax01 (talk) 13:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

.NET MeetupsEdit

No meetup is defined.

Related pages in sister projectsEdit

External linksEdit