Talk:Mail privileges of Guantanamo Bay detainees

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled

edit

Your facts on the affidavit are wrong, Geo Swan. According to the New York Times, the filing speaks of restricting attorney visits and information provided by attorneys to their clients. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/washington/26gitmo.html In the interest of sound scholarship, and the use of source materials, do you have a link to the actual affidavit and filing that accompanies it?Yachtsman1 (talk) 23:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

You say I am wrong? Yet aren't you merely paraphrasing what I wrote? Geo Swan (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Request for Mediation - I will not engage in an edit war with you. Your claim is not supported by your own source, and does not link to the actual document described. The disputed claim is as follows:

"Captain Patrick M. McCarthy, Joint Task Force Guantanamo's Staff Judge Advocate submitted an affidavit about further restrictions the Department of Defense wanted to place on mail between Guantanamo habeas counsels and their clients."

I request a neutral third party mediate this issue. Thank youYachtsman1 (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am very relieved to read you are denouncing edit warring. May I suggest you be more specific about what you think is wrong with this passage? If you state your concern clearly, maybe you will convince me, in which I will happily modify the passage myself, and no 3rd party will be necessary. Geo Swan (talk) 20:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
A neutral third party will also need a specific explanation of your concern. Geo Swan (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I made a slight change to add facts as stated in the article that were left out of your original post. My main concern is that this article be both neutral and true to the links. The remaining issues we can address later.Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Detainees

edit

I have modified this page, replacing the term "captive" with the proper term of "detainee". Thank you. Yachtsman1 (talk) 07:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Mail privileges of Guantanamo Bay detainees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply