Talk:Magnet Cove, Arkansas
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Arkansas may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled edit
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class becuase it uses the [[Category:Arkansas stub]] on the article page.
- If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
Even this page asks for Wikipedians from Arkansas to add content to this page, which is what I'm TRYING to do......several times. But someone evidently feels like they own it & keeps deleting this info. If you want to discuss exactly what the location of Magnet Cove is famous for, I'd be glad to feel you in....I've studied the area for years. If you DON'T care to discuss it, then plese quit thrashing the page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.14.215.240 (talk) 11:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- It is not content. It is link spam. You've been referred repeatedly to WP:EL, WP:SPAM, WP:NOT and WP:COI. Your goal is to promote the website you keep adding, not to improve the encyclopedia. Add content, not links. Cheers Geologyguy (talk) 14:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh well, at least I give honest attempts to add some decent content to a stub article which has basically none. Other seem intent on keeping it a stub, which is pretty much useless in it's current form. I don't promote my web-sites, which can easily be seen by just how LITTLE traffic they get. I have no reason to advertise them as was being claimed, since they are completely non-commercial. They are solely for bringing together proven & documented information on certain lesser known places & events ... such as this very one. I always figured an encyclopedia was where one went to gather information on a subject, which he desired information on. But that's quite obviously not the philosophy of some people here. They would much rather delete other peoples work, rather than let at least SOME content be available until something better came along. I find it very curious that you were in a VERY big hurry to get rid of this highly offensive material related to the subject of the article .... but you have not even spent 2 minutes since then attempting to ADD anything yourself. I have a feeling that if one were to look at your complete Wiki-History, that would most likely be the great majority of the type content you have brought to Wiki ... deleting others stuff, but adding absolutely nothing of any value of your own. There's LOTS of "editors" just like you on Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.159.69.146 (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)