Talk:Magix Music Maker

Untitled comment from years ago

Hello Magix, It seems as though you forgot a very great release of yours. Magix Sudio 2005 Deluxe! A great DAW I must say! It also works with ASIO,VST,Quicktime,Helix Dna and if I'm not mistaken ReWire. extremely user friendly, works with countless interfaces. Being from 2005 can say it was extremely ahead of it's time! I'm seeing some of these DAW's that still dont have some things this version carries.. Besides being pretty user friendly. Though, if you have no knowledge in this area then you should read the manual and try and understand what you will! I'm surprised this DAW was overlooked considering how well if performs! No crashes,bugs or glitches! Perhaps cause I use a high powered PC! I don't know but its a workhorse for me. I have hundreds of recordings mixed exactly how I like it. So when I'm ready to sit down in a studio,record analog I can hand my engineer that cd and say "this is how I want it sounding"! Crisp clean no hiss, just amazing.. Once you learn the DAW like the back of your hand you may even second guess why bring it to a studio when this will work just as great! Simple, I want to see how much a difference between the 2 recordings there actually is. If Samplitude is anyway near as great as this one. If so I'm willing to to get it! The asking price is a bit steep! I see 70 gb of samples, who really needs all that? With the world and a microphone at your fingertips! please make a small section on MAGIX MUSIC STUDIO 2005 DELUXE! Thank You Sincerely Richie Marty

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magix Music Maker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130804090721/http://musicmakernew.com/ to http://www.musicmakernew.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Relevance of article

I have to say altho it’s been me updating this, I’m not sure how relevant this program is anymore. It seems to have a limited amount of millennial users who have been with the program since the 2000s from looking at the forums for it. I might be wrong. Manboobies (talk) 18:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)