Talk:Mărculești

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Dc76 in topic Move?

Move? edit

User:Dc76 and I have been moving around this page for several days and we've come to the conclusion that it's best to have it at Mărculeşti: it's a city, implying primary usage, and the disambiguation page is linked from the top. Any objections to a move? - Biruitorul Talk 22:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

yes, yes. This should be moved back to Mărculeşti: this is the primary meaning, and there can be no confusion. If you mention the name to someone, people would understand the city. Only if you mean other meanings, you have to be more specific and disambiguate. It was me who originally moved it away from Mărculeşti two days ago. But unfortunately I cannot undo myself now, because I made an itermediate edit. Dc76\talk 22:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply