Talk:Lupeni strike of 1929

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


I have nominated the article for WP:DYK please check the question Alex Bakharev 11:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

  1. This article contradicts itself
    First, it says that "communist agitators had an important role in radicalising the miners.", but then it says "the communists' overall role had been small"
  2. It contains orignal research:
    "As these actions had an air of sabotage, it appears very likely that communist agitators had an important role in radicalising the miners."
  3. unattributed claims:
    "communist agitators were active in the spring of 1929 in the Jiu Valley"
    "in order to prevent the mines from being flooded and those underground from being asphyxiated"
  4. And weasel words:
    "it appears","According to later testimony,"

Anonimu 23:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lupeni strike of 1929. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply