Talk:Lung cancer screening

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 21 September 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Qipwex, Madeline.matthys, Rose811811.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lung cancer screening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Japan

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

User:Fgrannis - working in Wikipedia is really, really different than writing a paper in normal science.

Here in Wikipedia, what you write has to summarize the source. You cannot write what you know, and put a citation that provides an example of it. That is not OK here. It is very hard for scientists to switch gears when coming to Wikipedia. But it is necessary.

The content below is not supported by the sources provided, and the sources are old, primary sources. The sources that we summarize here are secondary (like literature reviews or book chapters) or tertiary (like textbooks). And we just summarize them. The idea is not hard, but it is hard for scientists to adjust sometimes/

Experience with population lung cancer screening in Japan

Japan is the only nation where there is a large experience with population lung cancer screening.^{[citation needed]} National laws mandate access to yearly chest roentgenograms in the workplace, and screening programs are also available in schools and regional health clinics.^{[citation needed]} Data on over 3 million patients screened since 1987, under the Health and Medical Services Law, has been carefully examined by the Japanese National Lung Cancer Screening Research Group and published in a number of papers.^{[citation needed]} A number of recent studies from Japan have offered strong suggestive evidence that radiographic screening increases lung cancer 5-year survival in patients detected in mass screening programs (32-56%) versus patients symptom-detected patients (11.3-25%).^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]

References

^ Sobue, T; Suzuki, T; Matsuda, M; Kuroishi, T; Ikeda, S; Naruke, T (1 February 1992). "Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated. Comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cases. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group" (PDF). Cancer. 69 (3): 685–92. PMID 1730119.
^ Sobue, T; Suzuki, T; Naruke, T (21 January 1992). "A case-control study for evaluating lung-cancer screening in Japan. Japanese Lung-Cancer-Screening Research Group". International journal of cancer. 50 (2): 230–7. PMID 1730517.
^ Shimizu, N; Ando, A; Teramoto, S; Moritani, Y; Nishii, K (May 1992). "Outcome of patients with lung cancer detected via mass screening as compared to those presenting with symptoms". Journal of surgical oncology. 50 (1): 7–11. PMID 1573898.
^ Sobue, T; Suzuki, T; Naruke, T (May 1992). "Efficacy of lung cancer screening; comparison of results from a case-control study and a survival analysis. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group". Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann. 83 (5): 424–30. PMID 1618694.
^ Naruke, T; Kuroishi, T; Suzuki, T; Ikeda, S (1993). "Comparative study of survival of screen-detected compared with symptom-detected lung cancer cases. Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group". Seminars in surgical oncology. 9 (2): 80–4. PMID 8488360.

-- Jytdog (talk) 02:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lung cancer screening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Planned/incoming edits by medical students to this page - work plan

Article chosen: Lung Cancer Screening

Why this one: It is a very important public health issue that can help to prevent a lot of morbidity and mortality.

Initial Analysis of the article:

The article isn’t organized in order of most pertinent to least. It would be more logical to have the Guidelines for screening be at the top

Overall organization, what changes:

Move the guidelines below the background and rename the History section to a title that accurately reflects the content in that section.

What will you add?:

More about the actual history of lung cancer screening

What will you remove?:

Outdated image captions; redundancy in the background and risks section

What will you augment?:

Recent history of lung cancer screening from the time the article was last updated (latests posts from the talk page are from January 2017)

What will you decrease coverage of?:

Outdated history/research content

Peer Review: - The structure of the article is very clear and logical. The introduction does a good job of providing relevant information such as the efficacy/prevalence of lung cancer screening. It could be worthwhile to include a sentence about different modalities of such screening. The language is clear and not repetitive. -The history and development of guidelines sections are good but could probably be combined as they both use chronological review of lung cancer screening to explore its evolution.

Add topic

[1] Sobue, T; Suzuki, T; Matsuda, M; Kuroishi, T; Ikeda, S; Naruke, T (1 February 1992). "Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated. Comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cases. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group" (PDF). Cancer. 69 (3): 685–92. PMID 1730119.

[2] Sobue, T; Suzuki, T; Naruke, T (21 January 1992). "A case-control study for evaluating lung-cancer screening in Japan. Japanese Lung-Cancer-Screening Research Group". International journal of cancer. 50 (2): 230–7. PMID 1730517.

[3] Shimizu, N; Ando, A; Teramoto, S; Moritani, Y; Nishii, K (May 1992). "Outcome of patients with lung cancer detected via mass screening as compared to those presenting with symptoms". Journal of surgical oncology. 50 (1): 7–11. PMID 1573898.

[4] Sobue, T; Suzuki, T; Naruke, T (May 1992). "Efficacy of lung cancer screening; comparison of results from a case-control study and a survival analysis. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group". Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann. 83 (5): 424–30. PMID 1618694.

[5] Naruke, T; Kuroishi, T; Suzuki, T; Ikeda, S (1993). "Comparative study of survival of screen-detected compared with symptom-detected lung cancer cases. Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group". Seminars in surgical oncology. 9 (2): 80–4. PMID 8488360.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]