Talk:Lords Commissioners

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld/ldcomp/ctso54.htm (archive)
  • In Lords Commissioners on 2007-06-24 14:44:10, 404 Not found
  • In Lords Commissioners on 2007-07-11 12:39:02, 404 Not found

The web page has been saved by the Internet Archive. Please consider linking to an appropriate archived version: [1]. --Stwalkerbot 12:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The link has now been replaced. Road Wizard (talk) 23:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

David Liddington

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lidington is now the Lord Chancellor which makes him a Lords Commissioner, I am not quite sure how to work that into the text as it is talking about who was a commissioner at the time of prorogation (end of the last parliament) and I am not entirely sure if he becomes a commissioner instantly on appointment to Chancellor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanbelllibertus (talk • contribs) 09:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lords Commissioners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605022314/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld/ldcomp/ldctso53.htm to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld/ldcomp/ldctso53.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303195607/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld/ldcomp/ldctso56.htm to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld/ldcomp/ldctso56.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Composition

Based on reading Hansard archives, I have pieced together an evolution of the composition of the commission:

• From as early as 1806 until the first world war it was the norm for all commissioners to come from the governing party - indeed, frequently they would all be ministers.
• Between the first and second world wars there were many hung parliaments and grand coalitions. This was reflected in mixed teams of commissioners.
• In the fifties there was no obvious rule. The Lord Chancellor always took the principal role and there would usually be at least one other member of the governing party, but the other three were variable. Occasionally a non-party peer was included.
• From 1964 until 1992 a convention emerged: The Lord Chancellor, the leader of the house, the shadow leader, the leader of the liberal peers and a third (seemingly random) member of the governing party.
• From 1993 the crossbench convenor replaced the third government peer.
• From 2007 the Lord Chancellor dropped out and the leader of the house took the principal role, with the Lord Speaker in second place.

Robin S. Taylor (talk) 22:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Current comissioners

I think it is not sensible to predict future comissioners, even though, based on current convention, it seems easy to predict them. Is it really sensible to list comissioners which were never listed in a letters patent? At least, we should get sources for this predictions but not be ourself the source. Does anyone has an good idea how it can be better represented and sourced? --Theoreticalmawi (talk) 15:16, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Found a (not realy reliable source). I think we should go with this till better sources are available or something in the current practice is changing. Theoreticalmawi (talk) 11:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)