Talk:LookSmart/Archive 1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 222.64.211.100 in topic The specification should not be missed....
Archive 1

find Articles

Hmm. I'm inclined to think it a damn shame they're not doing better. I recently discovered Looksmart's http://www.findarticles.com and it does, as promised, have content not found anywhere else - or rather, it seems to display articles that are usually registration or to pay for. --bodnotbod 07:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

BeSeen

The article maybe could mention that LookSmart took over Beseen, although I'm unsure of that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.6.222 (talkcontribs) 02:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Video

Here are is a video clip of an interview that i conducted with the Interim CEO in January Through to October 2004. Please review and include as a link should it be viable. Billy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metrixmedia (talkcontribs) 16:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


furl.net

Why is there no mention of furl.net in this articie? Gary 10:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

... Answer: Gary, yes, there should be at least a mention of furl.net in this article. It just needs to be added. Perhaps furl.net should have it's own article? (See del.icio.us, digg, reddit, or Google Notebook.) The wikipedia default search on "furl.net" redirects to this article: LookSmart but it probably should redirect to this article: Furl instead? ... just now discovered the Furl article, purely by accident. How can the "furl.net" redirect be fixed?

Meanwhile:

FURL.NET discussion

There is a very new Google Group for discussing furl.net, see:

http://groups.google.com/group/furl-users — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.109.180.159 (talkcontribs) 02:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Added mention of furl and furl.net in the article GeoFan49 03:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The specification should not be missed....

as some of the users have been, are willing to, paying for the products and services--222.64.211.100 (talk) 10:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)