Talk:Lomandra filiformis
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Identification
editThese current two photographs are not L. filiformis, which i know very well as a professional field botanist in eastern Victoria, on & off since the late 1980s. Please refer to here, here, here,here & here, for examples.
Looks like Lomandra longifolia only in flower not in fruit, and/or a weak form or Lomandra longifolia subsp. exilis. In fruit, as can be seen in the photos here & here, the individual fruits are much 'chunkier' than individual flowers, making the inflorescence much 'fatter' looking (sorry not the best words—busy!) Cheers. PS. if i have time i'll come back, perhaps with good photos of my own, and do some work editing. ——--macropneuma 06:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
