Talk:Lockheed L-049 Constellation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Merger proposal edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was no consensus. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I propose that Lockheed C-69 Constellation be merged into Lockheed L-049 Constellation. This is not just due to the fact that relatively few C-69's existed, but that there is little practical difference between the C-69 and the L-049, only a re-badging exercise for compliance with the USAF's military designation convention. I feel, that due to the limited difference and limited content, that excessive sub-devision had taken place, where it may have been more practical and straightforward to keep together. All input is very welcome. Kyteto (talk) 23:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic